28.5.40

This is the first day on which newspaper posters are definitely discontinued… Half of the front page of the early Star[1] devoted to news of the Belgian surrender, the other half to news to the effect that the Belgians are holding out and the King is with them. This is presumably due to paper shortage. Nevertheless of the early Star’s eight pages, six are devoted to racing.

For days past there has been no real news and little possibility of inferring what is really happening. The seeming possibilities were: i. That the French were really about to counterattack from the south. ii. That they hoped to do so but that the German bombers were making it impossible to concentrate an army. iii. That the forces in the north were confident of being able to hold on and it was thought better not to counterattack till the German attack had spent itself, or iv. That the position in the north was in reality hopeless and the forces there could only fight their way south, capitulate, be destroyed entirely or escape by sea, probably losing very heavily in the process. Now only the fourth alternative seems possible. The French communiqués speak of stabilising the line along the Somme and Aisne, as though the forces cut off in the north did not exist. Horrible though it is, I hope the B.E.F.[2] is cut to pieces sooner than capitulate.

People talk a little more of the war, but very little. As always hitherto, it is impossible to overhear any comments on it in the pubs, etc. Last night, E.[3] and I went to the pub to hear the 9 o’c news. The barmaid was not going to have it on if we had not asked her, and to all appearances nobody listened.

For further notes on Orwell’s War-time Diary, click here.

[1] There were at this time three London evening papers: Star, Evening News, Evening Standard; only the last has survived; it is still published.

[2] British Expeditionary Force, the troops in France at the time of the country’s fall to the Germans

[3] Eileen, Orwell’s wife. Peter Davison

This entry was posted in Political, War-time and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to 28.5.40

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention 28.5.40 « THE ORWELL PRIZE -- Topsy.com

  2. Phil Barker says:

    Welcome back Eric. I still find it amazing that the BEF didn’t capitulate or get (entirely) cut to pieces. There’s a BBC slide show at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8695580.stm explaining what wasn’t on the news then.

    (BTW, Editor, the link to the further notes seems broken)

  3. @Phil Barker

    Thanks for that Phil – should now be working!

  4. The prose in this post is a welcome feast for my starving eyeballs. On-the-spot reportage and social commentary from a brilliant wordsmith with supernatural observational skills.

    George is desperate for news, but gets 75% race results. He is forced to make inferences. War is seldom discussed. Even in the local pub, news is an afterthought. He doesn’t know that there’s still a week left in The Battle of Dunkirk.

    Is Eric thinking to himself–as he and Eileen throw back a few pints and play some darts–that he’s looking Inside the Whale from the outside?

  5. Barry Larking says:

    In connection with note [2] above. At least part of the explanation for the Fall of France is that the B.E.F. left them to it. With neither the equipment nor tatics clearing off seemed the only option for the British, who failed to inform their ally until the final hours. The fighting in France went on after the last troops were evacuated from the Channel ports. Incidentally, no more than 20,000 were taken off by the “little boats”. The R.N. carried the bulk. I have never heard or read anyone who was there describe Dunkirk except as a defeat.

  6. Pingback: 24.6.40 « THE ORWELL PRIZE

  7. Pingback: 15.4.41 « THE ORWELL PRIZE

  8. Pingback: War Time Diary 15.4.41 — crytical

Leave a comment